Flightsim.to
    LivToAir veröffentlicht Cessna Citation CJ3+

    LivToAir veröffentlicht Cessna Citation CJ3+

    F

    Flightsim.to

    Author

    May 8, 2025
    Store

    LivToAir hat seine Nachbildung der ⭐ Cessna Citation CJ3+ für den Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 und 2024 veröffentlicht und bringt damit diesen modernen leichten Geschäftsjet in den virtuellen Himmel. Die Citation CJ3+ gehört zur angesehenen Citation-Serie von Cessna und bietet ein ausgewogenes Verhältnis von Leistung, Komfort und Single-Pilot-Fähigkeit. Mit einer Reichweite von ca. 2.040 Seemeilen und einer Sitzkapazität für bis zu neun Passagiere ist das Flugzeug besonders für seine Effizienz und starke Kurzstreckenleistung bekannt.

    LivToAir hat sich darauf konzentriert, ein realistisches Erlebnis zu liefern, insbesondere in Bezug auf Avionik und Systeme. Das Flugzeug verfügt über die Garmin G3000-Avioniksuite, die mit Hilfe von benutzerdefinierten Implementierungen des WTG3000 und GTC nachgebildet wurde. Zu den zusätzlichen Erweiterungen gehören Seiten für die Initialisierung, die Außenbeleuchtung, das Temperaturmanagement sowie die Start- und Landedaten. Diese Systeme sollen das moderne Cockpit-Layout der echten CJ3+ nachbilden.

    Der Genauigkeit des Flugmodells wurde höchste Priorität eingeräumt, zusammen mit einem maßgeschneiderten Wwise-Sounddesign und vollständig implementierten Enteisungssystemen mit sichtbaren Vereisungseffekten. Das Flugzeug verfügt außerdem über acht Bemalungen und eine vollständig interaktive Kabine. Sie können ein integriertes EFB nutzen, das Zugriff auf Apps zur Verwaltung von Flugzeuggewichten, Karten, Notizen sowie Navigraph- und SimBrief-Integration bietet.

    Wenn Sie daran interessiert sind, die Cessna Citation CJ3+ zu Ihrer Flotte hinzuzufügen, kann dieses Payware-Add-on jetzt ⭐ auf Flightsim.to bezogen werden.

    Comments

    C
    CptD

    about 1 year ago

    I don’t get the point. Its a tiny variation on an aircraft we already have as default?
    N
    N069NT

    about 1 year ago

    Some people just like something different even if it’s mostly the same as what the default aircraft are. Another example is Asobo’s Daher TBM 930, but Just Flight sells an older TBM 850 variant (pre-Garmin 3000 cockpit with dials). That said, I’d never be interested in this simply because I like the Honeywell avionics in the CJ4 for being different than the Garmins as well as that aircraft being a little faster than the CJ3+.
    M
    MatteoD0203

    about 1 year ago

    Default G3000 + default CJ4 sound which doesn’t represent the CJ3+ at allModeling is not the best at all. Specially on the engine. This thing is a no no
    s
    stefanozab

    about 1 year ago

    I can't understand why in 2025 'new aircraft' means adding an EFB in the cockpit…
    i
    ibanezplayer200

    about 1 year ago

    I usually don’t post comments much at all but seeing these rediculous and uneducated comments actually really piss me off.
    Don’t want the plane? Don’t buy it. Easy.
    I did my first flight in this yesterday and it has a wonderful flight model, and unbelievable amount of detail in the cockpit, in the cabin AND the exterior. Load your simbrief and weights with one click in the EFB. This CJ3+ is nothing short of awesome and it’s very clear when you do a flight and explore the plane that a lot of work went into it.
    You plebs complaining want a different plane why don't you make your own? To lazy? Not smart enough? Unwilling? Nobody is forcing you buy the plane but you keyboard cowboys love to sit here and shame a genuine developer that put a lot of work into their product for absolutely no reason.
    Great work LivToAir.
    Don't let these silly comments get you down. It’s a wonderful product and congratulations on releasing it! Thank you for your time and hard work!
    S
    SimflyerAlex

    about 1 year ago

    AMEN :)
    C
    CptD

    about 1 year ago

    At least the TBM930 and the TBM850 have a different engine management system.
    C
    CptD

    about 1 year ago

    Sorry lad but you got ripped off. People are commenting because we are sending a message to developers, as their customers that we don’t want generic reskins of default aircraft. They openly state it uses the default WTG3000 as the basis. Its lazy. But I guess you must work for LivToAir lol.
    i
    ibanezplayer200

    about 1 year ago

    What do you think is in the CJ3+?
    It’s literally the G3000 suite.
    Everything works as it should including VNAV.
    “Generic reskin"….
    You are sadly what’s wrong with the community.
    SteveJay

    about 1 year ago

    Immediately having a blast flying this aircraft. Hand flying is a true joy.
    Thank you for the aircraft!
    ftz

    about 1 year ago

    Congrats on yet another piss poor cash grab
    Tom68

    about 1 year ago

    People complaining towards a software developer about a trend from the real world. Planes are becoming more and more generic with everyone using the same avionics suite. This little plane stands out by its handflying „feeling“ and funny features in the cabin.Actually serving a „demand“ by the community that has been brought up again and again over the last years for a functioning toilet and working coffee spender 🤣.
    If you want a challenge you need to look for older planes. Me personally I am dreaming of having a Convair 340 or Fairchild C-119 with a detail engine physics modelling like A2A or Blacksquare have done it.
    But that has nothing to do with the purpose of this little Maschine here……fun „hand“ flying with some cabin joy.
    m
    mmeares

    about 1 year ago

    What a shame. Maybe there willl be updates. Once again msfs get rich gang
    m
    mmeares

    about 1 year ago

    Hilarious
    C
    CaptainFisher

    about 1 year ago

    great Little aircraft- There are great crew hops specials and to be honest it flies really well, stick flying is great. The lighting needs some work, the gigantic ball around the Beacon is a little uh oh,. but i’ve made a fix for this.
    great work!
    heatmizr

    about 1 year ago

    It’s basically a CJ4 with a G3000 suite. If this is what you're looking for, like I am, check it out. The only disappointment for me is the interior textures. I think I prefer the Phenom 100, but I’ll give it a few more flights before I pass judgment.
    iang

    about 1 year ago

    "Don't want the plane, don't buy it"... Well, sir, if the plane hadn't been advertised as a revolutionary add-on, enthusiasts wouldn't have been misled into purchasing it. The fact of the matter is that it failed to meet our expectations. Period.
    ibanezplayer200

    about 1 year ago

    It's exactly as it was advertised. A CJ3+ with a G3000 suite. What were you expecting? Something mind blowing never seen in a simulator before?
    Get a grip brother. Lol
    It met and exceeded my expectations because it’s what I expected.
    o
    owend1944

    about 1 year ago

    Juvenile comments here. Goes back to same argument. Some think that every aircraft has to be study level. Even though most of the silly comments here are from those who will never fly a CJ3+ in real life. Its a simulation people. Not real life and it was never intended to be.
    GregK

    about 1 year ago

    Phenom is smaller, very high cockpit and bad visibility in VR (like Honda). This one is almost as good visibility in VR as Vision Jet is :)
    hardleftbank

    about 1 year ago

    msfs2020 and 2024 are full of cash grabs…sadly.
    Gargantua1984

    about 1 year ago

    This plane is very good; I think it's much better than the CJ4. But has anyone ever experienced the "cabin pressure" alarm going off above 10,000 feet? And it's quite annoying.
    z06z33

    about 1 year ago

    I would have preferred an older CJ like a straight CJ or CJ1 with a mix of steam and glass
    barryvernick

    about 1 year ago

    I completely agree with you
    willnosm

    about 1 year ago

    the avionic indeed put me off. still prefer proline 21 avionic
    B
    Batwingsix

    about 1 year ago

    Not to mention everyone is apparently an armchair expert in everything aviation…. By the comments left here, I guess it is safe to say that a 1972 C172 is the same as a 2019 C206T because it looks similar. Every day the phrase “You can’t fix stupid” becomes more prevelant on the internet.
    P
    PierreLenz

    about 1 year ago

    This plane is really good, but some bugs still need to be addressed. In particular, the cabin pressure warning remains active, which is quite annoying. and some mouse rolling clics noises, but I’m sure the developper are going to improve this.
    Pasta8321

    8 months ago

    The standard CJ4 flies better than this trash of a product. And the CJ4 comes with the game.
    If this plane was free, it would have still been a bad deal. Even planes in Grand Theft Auto have a better flight model.
    30$ for this shit?
    Pasta8321

    8 months ago

    Handflying, yeah. This plane eats the same amount of fuel at fl250 as it does at 450.
    Pasta8321

    8 months ago

    I don’t understand defending bad products like these. They literally make everything worse for everyone. Instead of money going to proper plane developers, they go to trash shovelers like livtoair.
    Why reward trash like this?
    Pasta8321

    8 months ago

    Imagine praising one of the worst airplane releases of 2024.
    Pasta8321

    8 months ago

    He’s right, the plane is trash and the flight model is one of the worst a payware plane has had in years.
    If you enjoy eating out of the dumpster, don’t get mad when people call you a hobo.
    Pasta8321

    8 months ago

    Flew this “revolutionary” plane and … it really is revolutionary.
    It’s the first plane that eats the same amount of fuel at fl250 as it does at fl450.
    In case it wasn’t obvious: DO NOT BUY THIS. PURE MONEYGRAB.