![[GSX Pro] LIMC - Aerosoft Milano Malpensa [Official Rework IVAO & VATSIM] - Image 1](https://cdn.flightsim.to/images/28/20260430_122610_e73db5d418f6055d_limc-milano-malpensa-gsx-pro-profile-aerosoft.png)
Beschreibung
Detailed GSX Pro Profile - Aerosoft Milano Malpensa (ICAO: LIMC - IATA: MXP).
!! All other gates and parking are completed and ready to use. Enjoy ;)
MAKE SURE TO REPOSITION YOUR AIRCRAFT AS SOON AS YOU SPAWN IN THE SIM
INSTALLATION & VDGS USAGE IN READ ME FILE
Features:
- Complete rework of GSX profile allowing for latest Feature;
- Full GSX-VDGS integration at Parkings which requires them in real life (SEE ABOVE),
Aerosoft VDGS Profile also available to select;
- Realistic Handlers and Caterer with dedicated description file (SEE SCREENSHOT),
- Accurate GSE placement based on IRL experience,
- Realistic Walk-In passenger path at Easyjet Terminal 2
- Realistic Walk-In passenger path in Gates used by Ryanair and Wizzair at Terminal 1
- Custom Gates Names (SEE SCREENSHOT),
- Custom Stop Position for each A/C,
- Accurate Airlines-Parking coding.
- Custom Pushback procedure:
Tug Release Point,
- Engine start clearance point;
- Custom De-Icing Areas.
!! This Profile accurately tries to represent real life operation at Milano Malpensa, It has been created mainly for usage in combination with Online Network such IVAO & Vatsim. To permit such operation, the following change has been made:
- Some Stop Positions have been misaligned on Purpose to prevent aircraft from clipping inside jetways, buildings and ground clutter;
- Some parking and gates have been renamed to represent ramp dynamics in Malpensa.
ENJOY AND PLEASE REPORT ANY ISSUE IN THE COMMENTS.
Kommentare(59)
Melden Sie sich an, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen
AnmeldenAngepinnter Kommentar
v
3 days ago
GSX Gate 412 - passenger walking problem
v
3 days ago
GSX VDGS - Gate 511 problem
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
about 8 hours ago
GSX (all versions) Fix: A docking system could appear at the wrong height, sunk into the ground or floating above it, when the scenery was still loading around it. The height is now measured after the terrain underneath has settled, instead of at a fixed moment after the display appears, which on a slow-loading airport happened too early.
FSDT Latest
FSDT Latest
P
6 days ago
Hi, this problem occurs at many gates; could you tell me if it's caused by GSX or Aerosoft?
v
3 days ago
You must disabled the Aerosoft VDGS BGL file in the folder, if you use GSX.
j
16 days ago
777 cargo parking, none available. it should be on the spots to the side
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
12 days ago
Can you confirm the profile is installed correctly because I can see the loader are in their default position, rather than what I have customised, also half of the stand in cargo city 700 are not modelled, only graphical representation has been made by Aerosoft, so not much I can do with GSX.
j
12 days ago
Yes it is installed correctly. How else would it be installed?
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
10 days ago
I am trying to troubleshoot based on what I see, so then if everything is good can you give me more info so I can recreate? Many Thanks
F
about 2 months ago
Thanks for the Profile!
BUT: You're changing the Refuel Side on the Aircraft and that is not a good Design. It is something defined in the Aircraft Profile so it shouldn't be changed by the Airport Profile!
BUT: You're changing the Refuel Side on the Aircraft and that is not a good Design. It is something defined in the Aircraft Profile so it shouldn't be changed by the Airport Profile!
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
about 1 month ago
Ciao, Handler script takes care of it without interference to the aircraft itself, it’s just a visual thing, As done in MXP Refuelling on jetway side is preferred when the airline uses bridge boarding.
F
about 1 month ago
How can you call something not interfering when you override something that is not the Domain of the Airport Profile?
The Refuel Location is defined by the Aircraft Profile. It IS interfering with what GSX internally, the Aircraft Developer or the User sets for the Aircraft. Especially when other Apps try to interface with GSX and the Aircraft and build on the Defaults set by GSX' internal Aircraft Profiles (or the ones provided by the Developer) the Interference becomes even greater.
Changing that on the Fly in the Handler, makes it impossible for every native or external Integration that the Side was changed and adopt Service Calls accordingly.
I really appreciate your Effort and Work to make the Airport Profile as realistic as it can be. But we're still talking about an Addon in a Simulator that can only work in certain Ways and has Limitations.
The Refuel Location is defined by the Aircraft Profile. It IS interfering with what GSX internally, the Aircraft Developer or the User sets for the Aircraft. Especially when other Apps try to interface with GSX and the Aircraft and build on the Defaults set by GSX' internal Aircraft Profiles (or the ones provided by the Developer) the Interference becomes even greater.
Changing that on the Fly in the Handler, makes it impossible for every native or external Integration that the Side was changed and adopt Service Calls accordingly.
I really appreciate your Effort and Work to make the Airport Profile as realistic as it can be. But we're still talking about an Addon in a Simulator that can only work in certain Ways and has Limitations.
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
18 days ago
@Fragtality, right I got you, now then, have you experienced any issues at all? Because following multiple testing, I didn't have any complaints or bug manifest.
If this is the case, I am more than willing to correct them and provide a more robust solution.
Should this not match your expectations, I apologise for the inconvenience, please feel free to modify the profile to your own taste
If this is the case, I am more than willing to correct them and provide a more robust solution.
Should this not match your expectations, I apologise for the inconvenience, please feel free to modify the profile to your own taste
F
18 days ago
Yeah, I encountered it as Issue while using the PMDG 777(F) in Conjunction with Any2GSX. The internal GSX Profile and therefor the 777 Plugin (in A2G) default to the Refuel Location on the Left/Stair Side. Which for A2G means it handles the Stair Calls differently to allow Stairs and Refuel to be active at the same Time on that Side. So the Airport Profile had interfered with the Flow/Calls for Stairs & Refuel.
This Difference in A2G might be removed in future Builds, some early Tests with the new GSX Vehicle Paths & Checks seem to allow Stairs & Refuel to happen on the same Side. But for the Moment it still acts that Way. (Still have to wrap my Head around the new/first GSX WS API ^^)
But in any Case, I still believe that Airport Profiles shouldn't override Settings especially Positions in the Aircraft Profile. The Aircraft (and so its Profile) is basically the 'Avatar' of the Player so the 'Level' shouldn't change where Things are gonna be attached. Also when it is not a Custom/User Aircraft Profiles but a (Aircraft) Developer-provided Profile, it would also mean that such an Airport Profile would change Stuff the Aircraft Developer had envisioned differently.
A Fix/Workaround was easy for me, since I just quickly removed the respective Lines in the Python File. But the 'Average Joe' GSX User might be confused ^^
Thanks for your Understanding! I really like the Profile, keep up the great Work :)
This Difference in A2G might be removed in future Builds, some early Tests with the new GSX Vehicle Paths & Checks seem to allow Stairs & Refuel to happen on the same Side. But for the Moment it still acts that Way. (Still have to wrap my Head around the new/first GSX WS API ^^)
But in any Case, I still believe that Airport Profiles shouldn't override Settings especially Positions in the Aircraft Profile. The Aircraft (and so its Profile) is basically the 'Avatar' of the Player so the 'Level' shouldn't change where Things are gonna be attached. Also when it is not a Custom/User Aircraft Profiles but a (Aircraft) Developer-provided Profile, it would also mean that such an Airport Profile would change Stuff the Aircraft Developer had envisioned differently.
A Fix/Workaround was easy for me, since I just quickly removed the respective Lines in the Python File. But the 'Average Joe' GSX User might be confused ^^
Thanks for your Understanding! I really like the Profile, keep up the great Work :)
S
about 2 months ago
Ciao, am I the only one that is unable to operate the jetways? I tried everything but I always get the "gate has no jetway" GSX message (MSFS2024). Thank you!
S
about 2 months ago
P.S. I already repositioned my aircraft after spawning. This is not an issue with this custom GSX profile but with the scenery itself. Just looking out for help anywhere I can. Grazie :)
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
about 1 month ago
Unfortunately if it’s scenery related, It has to come from Aerosoft, GSX doen not control Jetway data.
j
3 months ago
None of the heavy gates fit a 777? It's all too far forward from stop lines.
L
LucaverzuraAuthor
3 months ago
what do you mean, can you pass me some examples?
MSFS 2020MSFS 2024
[GSX Pro] LIMC - Aerosoft Milano Malpensa [Official Rework IVAO & VATSIM]
The LIMC Milano Malpensa GSX Pro Profile offers a comprehensive update for Aerosofts Milano Malpensa airport.
Downloads9K
VersionvFS 2020 - Aerosoft Malpensa 2020
Dateigröße112.5 KB
VeröffentlichtVor 1 Jahr
AktualisiertVor 3 Monaten
Nutzerbewertungen
4.8
6 Bewertungen
5
83%
4
17%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
More Information
Versionsgeschichte
Added Handler Script to take advatage of latest GSX features.
3 months ago