Hi there, thank you for sharing this. Its very interesting for comparison as my created my own lnmperf file for this great aircraft before finding yours.

i created mine by entering some rough estimations, mostly from manual pdf, and then i did two test flights of about 100nm to adjust.

here are my comparisons to yours:

MinRunwayLengthFt: ive got 4000ft here, you 2200. Mine is "Landing distance" from the manual pdf. Im not sure if this is right, or better value is the "takeoff distance" or "balanced field length" (whatever this is) from the manual.UseableFuelLbsGal: Here i have the 206 from the manual, you have 213 gals. Why did you add some more? At descent you choose a far more flat angle than me: you 550 ft/m, i have 1155, but we both have exact same Fuelflow of 20. Ok, this depends on habits, i like to descent faster :)At cruise i tried to get to the 210 kts TAS as in the manual as "Economy cruise". For this i had to increase power so my fuelflow is about 50% higher than yours for only having 7 kts more speed. Hm. At Climb you are climb faster than me, with lower fuelflow and much less speed (1520ft/m, 92 kts, 30gals) than me (1120ft/m, 139(!) kts, 48.5gals). I tried to match climbrate with my descent rate here so thats were my values come from. Same as with descent: depends on habits maybe.

What i noticed is that with the latest beta release of the plane the fuel comsumption seems to have changed a bit so i have to do some more test flights and make more measurement.

best regards,

Andre