The stock Flight Design CT is modeled with a Rotax 912S (or iS). There are also some errors in the cfg files like wrong weights. wrong propeller blades (3 blades in the cfg file, 2 blades in the 3d model)
There are some minor errors also with some instruments (CHT, Oil Temperature) which stay in warning/danger ranges at cruise power settings.
All in all, it is unclear if asobo intention was to model a CTLS or a CT Supralight. We have a CTLS label on the fin but a CT Supralight badge on the cockpit. It is definitely confusing.
I replaced the stock 100hp Rotax 912S with a turbocharged 115hp Rotax 914UL using data taken from Rotax datasheets.
- https://www.flyrotax.com/produkte/detail/rotax-912-uls-s.html
- https://www.flyrotax.com/produkte/detail/rotax-914-ul-f.html
- https://flightdesign.com/ct-super-series
- https://flightdesign.com/ctls
The main difference with the stock 912 are 8kg of added weight, additional 15 hp and a turbocharger which will help high altitude operations.
Unzip to your community folder, no original files will be replaced.
Severeeno
Propeller is also correct. CTSL POH states two propeller options, one is 2-blades and one 3-blades. But I guess Asobo made a mistake in the flight model. Can you confirm that this is still wrong or maybe it has been corrected?
Can you explain what is wrong with weights?
quelcertoleo author
4 years ago
ryanbatc
Troglodytus
quelcertoleo author
4 years ago
wicklowdude
Archer374
4 years ago